Research Information System
Diagnostics, vol.15, no.14, 2025 (SCI-Expanded, Scopus)
Background/Objectives: Postoperative deep vein thrombosis (DVT) is a common and serious complication after tibial fracture surgery. This study aimed to develop and evaluate machine learning (ML) models to predict the occurrence of DVT following tibia fracture surgery. Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on patients who had undergone surgery for isolated tibial fractures. A total of 42 predictive models were developed using combinations of six ML algorithms—logistic regression, support vector machine, random forest, extreme gradient boosting, Light Gradient Boosting Machine (LightGBM), and neural networks—and seven feature selection methods, including SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP), Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator (LASSO), Boruta, recursive feature elimination, univariate filtering, and full-variable inclusion. Model performance was assessed based on discrimination, quantified by the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC-ROC), and calibration, measured using Brier scores, with internal validation performed via bootstrapping. Results: Of 471 patients, 80 (17.0%) developed postoperative DVT. The ML models achieved high overall accuracy in predicting DVT. Twenty-four models showed similarly excellent discrimination (pairwise AUC comparisons, p > 0.05). The top-performing model (random forest with RFE) attained an AUC of ~0.99, while several others (including LightGBM and SVM-based models) also reached AUC values in the 0.97–0.99 range. Notably, support vector machine models paired with Boruta or LASSO feature selection demonstrated the best calibration (lowest Brier scores), indicating reliable risk estimation. The final selected SVM models achieved high specificity (≥95%) with moderate sensitivity (~75–80%) for DVT detection. Conclusions: ML models demonstrated high accuracy in predicting postoperative DVT following tibial fracture surgery. Support vector machine-based models showed particularly favorable discrimination and calibration. These results suggest the potential utility of ML-based risk stratification to guide individualized prophylaxis, warranting further validation in prospective clinical settings.