Comparative analysis of performance data from various small-sided games with match data


Kaya K., Tarakci S., Gurol B.

BMC SPORTS SCIENCE, MEDICINE AND REHABILITATION, cilt.18, ss.1-22, 2026 (SCI-Expanded, Scopus) identifier

  • Yayın Türü: Makale / Tam Makale
  • Cilt numarası: 18
  • Basım Tarihi: 2026
  • Doi Numarası: 10.1186/s13102-026-01661-5
  • Dergi Adı: BMC SPORTS SCIENCE, MEDICINE AND REHABILITATION
  • Derginin Tarandığı İndeksler: Scopus, Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED), EMBASE, Directory of Open Access Journals
  • Sayfa Sayıları: ss.1-22
  • İstanbul Yeni Yüzyıl Üniversitesi Adresli: Evet

Özet

Background

Small-sided games (SSGs) represent one of the most popular football-specific training methods; however, their capacity to replicate the external load demands imposed during official competitive matches requires systematic investigation across different formats and competition levels.

Methods

This retrospective observational study compared external load parameters derived from four SSG formats (4vs4 + 3, 8vs8 + 1, 9vs9 + 1, 10vs10) with official match data from twenty professional male footballers (age: 27 ± 5.47 years; body mass: 79.56 ± 8.34 kg; height: 182.30 ± 6.38 cm) competing in the UEFA Conference League, Super League, and National Cup. External load variables including total distance (m), high-speed running distance (> 19.8 km/h), sprint distance (> 25 km/h), high metabolic power distance (> 25 W/kg), acceleration (> 2 m/s²), and deceleration (> 2 m/s²) were collected using 10 Hz GPS technology across 12 weeks of training and official matches.

Results

Statistical analysis revealed that the 10vs10 format produced external load values comparable to National Cup matches for multiple parameters, while the 8vs8 + 1 format demonstrated similarity to both Super League and Conference League fixtures. Conversely, the 4vs4 + 3 format was insufficient for approximating match-related physical demands across all parameters examined (p < 0.001). Sprint distance exhibited an exceptionally large effect size (η²=0.968), reflecting the substantial limitation of all SSG formats in approximating match sprint demands. Furthermore, all SSG formats produced significantly elevated acceleration-deceleration values compared to official matches.

Conclusions

These findings indicate that larger SSG formats more closely approximate selected match demands total, high-speed running, high metabolic power), though all SSG formats underrepresent sprint distance and produce elevated acceleration-deceleration frequencies compared to official matches.