S. Oral Et Al. , "Live birth rate with double ovarian stimulation is superior to follicular phase ovarian stimulation per started cycle in poor ovarian responders," Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Research , vol.47, no.8, pp.2705-2712, 2021
Oral, S. Et Al. 2021. Live birth rate with double ovarian stimulation is superior to follicular phase ovarian stimulation per started cycle in poor ovarian responders. Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Research , vol.47, no.8 , 2705-2712.
Oral, S., KARACAN, M., Akpak, Y. K., Şişmanoğlu, A., & Sancaklı Usta, C., (2021). Live birth rate with double ovarian stimulation is superior to follicular phase ovarian stimulation per started cycle in poor ovarian responders. Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Research , vol.47, no.8, 2705-2712.
Oral, Serkan Et Al. "Live birth rate with double ovarian stimulation is superior to follicular phase ovarian stimulation per started cycle in poor ovarian responders," Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Research , vol.47, no.8, 2705-2712, 2021
Oral, Serkan Et Al. "Live birth rate with double ovarian stimulation is superior to follicular phase ovarian stimulation per started cycle in poor ovarian responders." Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Research , vol.47, no.8, pp.2705-2712, 2021
Oral, S. Et Al. (2021) . "Live birth rate with double ovarian stimulation is superior to follicular phase ovarian stimulation per started cycle in poor ovarian responders." Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Research , vol.47, no.8, pp.2705-2712.
@article{article, author={Serkan Oral Et Al. }, title={Live birth rate with double ovarian stimulation is superior to follicular phase ovarian stimulation per started cycle in poor ovarian responders}, journal={Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Research}, year=2021, pages={2705-2712} }